- reduce throttle
- lower flaps incrementally
- use pitch to control speed, and throttle to control altitude
- flare about ten feet from the ground
- touch down smoothly, apply brakes
Monday, November 16, 2009
SF/SFO
Flying's going well, if you're still interested. Today Harold and I practiced SF/SFO, or what everybody else calls Short Field and Soft Field Operations. This is just what it sounds like: landing and taking off on a short runway or a patch of soft ground.
See, as shocking as it sounds, you will not always be landing on a nice, long, paved runway. Sometimes you may be landing on a short dirt strip. Or a grass field. Or a sandy beach. (Bush pilots have to deal with these conditions all the time, so I'd better get good at it.) There's a certain special trick to pulling off these sorts of unusual landings and takeoffs. Normally, on a paved runway, all you have to do is let down some flaps, and—
I've been told I should really itemize things if I want to explain flying more clearly. So here goes a very basic explanation of what you need to do to land on a PAVED runway:
See, the landing gear on a Cessna 172 is set up like a tricycle. You have the two rear (or "main") wheels, and the nose wheel. During a soft field landing, you want to touch down ONLY on those two main wheels. This is because, when you touch down in a Cessna 172, you're still going rather fast by human standards: about 50 miles per hour or so. If you do a three-point landing and the nose wheel gets bogged down in the sand or wet grass or gravel or whatever, you run the risk of flipping the plane over. So the solution is to do a wheelie.
Yes, I'm serious. You touch down only on the back wheels, holding the control yoke back (but not too far back; you don't want to bang the tail on the ground). You hold the plane in that configuration for as long as you can. In a few seconds, the plane will slow down enough on its own (and lose enough lift from under those upturned wings) that the nose wheel will gently...
...come...
...down...
...by itself.
Bang, you're on the ground, right-side up.
Soft field takeoffs are even trickier. Remember how I said that flaps are normally used for landings? Well, you actually use flaps for soft field takeoffs, too. Just a little, though. What you do is lower the flaps about ten degrees, start your takeoff roll, then raise the nose as soon as you can. (Same reason as before: you don't want to get that dang nose wheel stuck or bogged down when you're going that fast.) So you're doing a wheelie down the runway. At 60 miles per hour, the plane will start to lift off, but you don't want to climb yet. You want to keep the plane low, just over the runway. When the plane reaches 80 miles per hour (the best speed for climbing), THEN you can start climbing. If you start climbing before the plane reaches 80, you'll leave ground effect and the plane could settle back down onto the ground.
("Ground effect" is what happens when you fly an airplane really close to Mother Earth, like right after takeoff. The plane isn't actually flying, per se, even though it's off the ground: the air getting pushed down by the wings is bouncing off the ground and hitting the plane again, pushing it up. Only when the plane reaches a certain speed is the necessary pressure differential created between the top and the bottom of the wings; that is what actually keeps the plane in the air without ground effect.)
If you're on a paved runway, lifting off at 60 and climbing out is no problem. If you lose ground effect (which usually doesn't happen) then you'll just bounce back down onto the nice hard runway. However, on a soft field...well, we've already discussed this. This is why you use flaps (for the extra lift) and hug the ground until your airspeed is 80 (so you know you can stay up).
In case my lengthy explanation hasn't made it clear, soft field takeoffs are flippin' hard. You have to really hold that yoke back to keep the nose wheel off the ground. (Good thing I've been doing all those lateral pull-downs on the weight machine, eh?) Then, after you take off, instead of keeping the nose pointed at the sky (like you do with every other type of takeoff), you actually sort of level out, pitching the plane back down again, riding ground effect until you reach 80, then climb. It's very, very counterintuitive. Needless to say, Harold had to help me with it the first couple of times until I could get a feel for it. My job was made harder (ironically) by how smooth the air was today. There was no wind at all. We didn't have a headwind to land into and slow us down (and make it easier to do wheelies). But I did my best.
I was grinning inside as we pulled up to the gate, shut down, and climbed out. I had just gotten a little taste of what I could expect out of a bush piloting career. Moreover, those kind of landings are just plain cool. They demand all of your attention and a great deal of manual dexterity (not to mention some biceps). And come on, I mean, wheelies? In an airplane?! Hot diggity!
Labels:
airplanes,
airports,
aviation,
flight school,
flying,
landings,
National Geographic,
short fields,
soft fields,
teacher
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
This is awesome. It just sounds so exciting.
Would it be inappropriate for me to call that plane "cute"? Well, it is.
I like the bullets. It would also be cool if you could set up an aviation glossary on the side of your page or something. Just a thought. Hope I'm not being too high maintenance.
Why, thank you! It 'twas exciting. I'm glad you find it so even after I wrote about it, though.
Cessna 172s are just about as cute as an aluminum thing with wings can be. I concur. The only thing that's cuter is perhaps the Airbus Beluga (Google it).
AN AVIATION GLOSSARY! EUREKA!!! Jeez, I've been wondering what I could use to fill up that sidebar. That way I could have more posts per page and not have an ugly great blank space on the right. Thanks for the tip. I'm always on the lookout for ways to improve the blog. Suggest away!
No, the Cessna 172s is cuter, by far (I Googled the Airbus Beluga). It just has this lovely innocence about it.
That airbus thing is just too weird and goofy. It reminds me of Jabberjaw. You're probably too young to know who that is. I used to have a Jabberjaw lunchbox. Why can't I stop myself from saying these random things? It's like blogger's Tourette's.
Ooh ooh ooh - verification word: etrumix
That it does. I've never heard anyone refer to a machine so poetically before...except me, of course. Strange to find someone who isn't a pilot who can recognize the innate beauty in the lines of a flying machine. I hope you don't lose that ability. It's precious.
Of course I know who Jabberjaw is! Have I not mentioned anywhere that I ADORE Hanna-Barbera cartoons? I'm more into Jonny Quest and Thundarr the Barbarian, yes, but I know Jabberjaw and Scooby-Doo and the Flintstones and the Jetsons! That stuff's classic no matter what generation you belong to. That Beluga is shaped just like him. There's something sort of eldritch about it, different from the Cessna's familiarity and innocence.
Please don't seek a cure for your blogger's Tourette's. I sense many fulfilling conversations ahead. I used to have a G.I. Joe lunchbox myself. Then I switched to pirates.
Etrumix? That's just BEGGING to be made into a cocktail. Sounds like a gin drink to me.
Post a Comment